Beyond Azure Lighthouse: What MSSPs Need for Sentinel at Scale

Reviewed by ContraForce team

Comparison

Azure Lighthouse handles access delegation. ContraForce handles security operations. Together, they give MSSPs the infrastructure and operational layers needed to deliver Sentinel services at scale.

Start a trial See pricing

No credit card. Connect one workspace: scoped Entra ID application consent, no endpoint agents, no log forwarding.

Lighthouse Is Infrastructure.
You Need Operations.

Azure Lighthouse solves an important problem: it lets MSSPs access customer Azure subscriptions and Sentinel workspaces through delegated resource management. That is the infrastructure layer. It handles RBAC, cross-tenant access, and resource visibility.

But Lighthouse does not triage incidents. It does not enforce standard operating procedures (SOPs). It does not automate investigation workflows or route tickets to your PSA. It gives you access to the data, not a system to act on it.

Most MSSPs using Lighthouse still rely on manual processes, custom scripts, and analyst effort to deliver consistent security services across tenants. That is the gap.

Lighthouse gets you in the door. ContraForce runs the operation once you are inside.

Lighthouse vs ContraForce

CapabilityAzure LighthouseContraForce
Cross-tenant visibilityDelegated resource management in Azure portalUnified SOC control plane with incident-level visibility
Incident automationNone: manual investigation requiredSecurity Delivery Agents automate triage, investigation, and response
SOP enforcementNo SOP capabilitiesGamebooks enforce SOPs with human-in-the-loop approvals
Per-tenant analyticsAzure Monitor and Sentinel per workspacePer-tenant delivery metrics, SLA tracking, and reporting
Deployment complexityARM templates, delegation setup per tenantFederated access with tenant-specific validation
RBAC managementAzure delegated RBAC: manual configurationRole-based access with tenant-level controls built in
AI-driven triageNot availableGamebook-governed triage and investigation for eligible workflows
Ticketing and PSA integrationNot availableNative integration with Autotask, ServiceNow and Jira; ConnectWise and others via webhooks

Lighthouse Alone vs.
Lighthouse + ContraForce

Lighthouse Only

Lighthouse + ContraForce

The Operations Layer
Lighthouse Does Not Provide

Automated Incident Execution

Lighthouse gives you access to incidents. ContraForce triages, investigates, enriches, documents, and routes them automatically. Your analysts handle escalations, not every alert.

SOP Enforcement via Gamebooks

Define your SOPs once. Gamebooks enforce them across every tenant, every incident, with human-in-the-loop approvals for high-risk actions. Delivery becomes repeatable.

Per-Tenant Delivery Analytics

Track SLA compliance, incident volume, response times, and analyst throughput per tenant. Lighthouse shows you resources. ContraForce shows you delivery performance.

PSA and Ticketing Integration

ContraForce routes incidents to ConnectWise, Autotask, ServiceNow, and Jira. Lighthouse has no concept of ticketing workflows. Your delivery pipeline stays connected end-to-end.

Frequently asked questions.

Does ContraForce replace Azure Lighthouse?

No. ContraForce complements Lighthouse. Lighthouse handles delegated access to customer Azure resources and Sentinel workspaces. ContraForce provides the operational layer on top: automated incident response, standard operating procedure (SOP) enforcement, and delivery analytics. Most MSSPs use both together.

Do I need Lighthouse if I use ContraForce?

Not necessarily. ContraForce uses its own federated access model to connect to customer Sentinel and Defender XDR environments. Some MSSPs use Lighthouse for broader Azure resource management alongside ContraForce for security operations. They are independent but complementary.

Can ContraForce work with my existing Lighthouse deployment?

Yes. ContraForce integrates with your existing Microsoft environment regardless of whether Lighthouse is deployed. There are no conflicts. ContraForce operates at the security operations layer while Lighthouse operates at the Azure resource management layer.

How does ContraForce handle cross-tenant access differently?

Lighthouse uses Azure delegated resource management with ARM templates. ContraForce uses a federated access model that connects to customer Sentinel and Defender XDR without requiring Azure subscription-level delegation. Validate access, permissions, and an eligible workflow for every connected tenant.

What if I am scaling from ten tenants to hundreds?

This is exactly where ContraForce provides the most value. Lighthouse alone does not run the incident workflow. ContraForce applies Gamebook-governed triage and investigation to eligible incidents, letting you measure analyst throughput and delivery cost as tenant count grows.

Is ContraForce only for Sentinel, or does it work with Defender XDR too?

ContraForce works with both Microsoft Sentinel and Defender XDR. The platform automates incident response across both products, giving your SOC a unified operational view regardless of which Microsoft security products your customers use.

See the Operations Layer
Your Lighthouse Deployment Is Missing

Connect ContraForce to your existing Sentinel environment and validate automated incident execution alongside your Lighthouse deployment.

Start a trial See pricing

No credit card. Connect one workspace: scoped Entra ID application consent, no endpoint agents, no log forwarding.